Estate Planning Essentials

by Philip on January 25, 2012

For most of us, this January opens with a long and involved ”to do” list. Hopefully one of the key points on your list is to get your estate planning in order. Too often people put off estate planning because they succumb to one of the major legal myths – that estate planning is just for the elderly.
In fact, the best time to begin working on your estate plan is today. That’s especially true if you have small children.
A well-thought out estate plan can help you make sure your children’s future will be in the hands of those you trust most and can help deal with any thorny family issues as well. That’s particularly important for families where there may be disagreement among extended family members about methods of child rearing, education or religion.
But having a young family isn’t the only criteria for getting your estate plan in order. Estate plans should be updated at the time of any major life change including:
• marriage
• divorce
• death of a spouse
• death of parents
Estate plans are also particularly critical for unmarried couples of the same or opposite sex who have property or children together or who may share custody of children they had with other partners. Such couples are in family situations where the law is constantly evolving, so it’s critical to work with an attorney with a strong estate planning background and who is up-to-date on the latest legal decisions involving non-traditional families.
What Does an Estate Plan Include and How Often Do I Need to Update it?
Elements of an estate plan may vary depending on individual situations, but the basics of an estate plan are:
• a will or trust
• a durable power of attorney
• a living will
Once an estate plan is drafted, it should be reviewed every five to seven years, or sooner if there is a major life change such as a divorce or separation.

Can’t I Just Use a Form Will?
There are lots of do-it-yourself will kits and, in larger markets, shops set up to help you do your own legal documents. The problem – those standardized kits rarely cover all the bases to meet your specific needs – and some of the gaps might have a significant adverse impacts on your estate.
What if I Don’t Have a Will?
Your spouse – even if you are separated – gets the first $250,000 of your estate. In the case of a widow or widower, the estate is divided equally among their surviving children. For example:
Mrs. Smith, a widow, passes away and her estate is divided equally among her four children.
Mrs. Smith’s neighbor, Mr. Jones, a widower, passes away and his estate is divided among his three children and the two children of a son who passed away before Mr. Jones. The surviving three children each get 25% of the estate, the two grandchildren each get 12 1/2%.
What About Trusts – Aren’t they Just for the Rich?
Today many people have formal  trusts – and not always for the best reasons. Too often trusts are looked upon as a way to avoid probate, but there are other, better reasons to create a trust.  Trusts are a great way to handle unusual situations where the estate includes property that requires attention or a business that needs to be run. A trustee that can step in and can be appointed to take charge through the use of a trust.
Consider a trust if you have volatile investments that require regular oversight, unusual investments or a unique business agreement between yourself and another individual involving a business or real estate.
Often placing a family member in a trustee role may not be the best decision. It all depends the reasons for the trust and the expertise of the potential trustee. Often a trust department of a bank or other neutral person may be better suited for the trustee role.
How We Can Help
At Rosi and Gardner we offer a free, one-hour consultation to discuss your estate planning needs.  When we meet we’ll talk with you about what you have and what you want to accomplish. We will work with you to begin your first estate plan, update an old one or create a unique plan that takes into consideration your special circumstances.  We’ll also give you an estimate of the cost for a new plan. Why not call us today at 231-941-5878? There’s never a better time to get started.

Family Trust Abuse

by Philip on December 21, 2011

For many years, there has been a strong push as an element of estate planning to place assets in a revocable living trust, primarily to avoid the cost and procedures of Probate. Generally, within a family situation, each spouse has some degree of responsibility as a Trustee of the other spouse’s trust, often in conjunction with another family member.  A problem, unfortunately all to common, may arise when the non-spouse trustee needs funds and with his/or her authority invades the principle of the trust, usually intending to pay it back – but being unable to to so. Once such a problem is discovered, the fall out often results in the creation of an insurmountable rift in the family,  followed by recrimination and, possibly, civil litigation as well as criminal proceedings. In view of the forgoing, both careful drafting of the legal instruments as well as an in depth analysis of the character and financial acumen of the non spousal trustee can reduce the potential for actions that may dramatically impact the financial conditions of the family for years to come.

Timber Sales

by Philip on December 21, 2011

With a downturn in the economy, landowners are often tempted to sell some or all of the marketable timber on their land, sometimes in response to the first person who approaches them, offering cash for the right to do so. The value of timber on land is generally not reflected in the appraisals of local tax assessors so, without consultation of with both a professional forester as well as an attorney with experience in timber contracts, a landowner may not be aware of the reasonable value of the timber on the land.  Moreover, without professional assistance,  a landowner may not be  reasonably protected from the persuasive sales pitch of a timber buyer nor receive a fair price for the trees that are taken. In addition, the forest, itself, may be overcut, taking many years to return to a condition consistent with the long range interests of the landowner for wildlife habitat and the like.

SCAM ALERT

by Philip on October 11, 2011

A new Scam has appeared.  A local elderly widow was contacted by phone and informed that she had won a prize in the “Mega Millions” lottery, although she had not  purchased a ticket.  The smooth talking caller informed her that such was not necessary and that he had $250,000 to be delivered to her, once she paid a relatively small amount of Federal taxes; more than $10,000.  She exhausted her retirement funds and had funds wired to the caller.  Of course, no money was ever received and the widow is not only out the several thousands of dollars she sent the caller but also is now the object of many other calls from persons with substantial foreign accents, again informing her that  she “had won” substantial sums.   She is both extremely embarrassed by her naivete and her willingness to trust an unseen person  who she thought of  “as a friend,” and distressed that she will likely never be able to recover the money that she sent to her “friend.”

Unfortunately I am afraid that she is not alone.  With all of the media praise for the Mega Millions program, as well as other “jackpots,”  it is not unexpected that criminal elements have found the opportunity to prey upon  unsophisticated and vulnerable elderly . using both the telephone and the internet to snare their victims and doing so from untraceable locations.

 

 

Estate Tax Conundrum

by Philip on August 16, 2011

Now that the we no longer need to follow the histrionics of Congress in its discussion of the Debt Ceiling, it is time to attempt to plan for the “sunset” provision in the current Estate and Gift tax.   More than 10 years ago the Estate and Gift Tax exemptions and rates were adjusted, so that in 2009 the exemption increased to $3.5 million and the minimum rate was reduced to 45% and for persons dying in 2010, the taxes were reduced to zero.  In late 2010, to avoid the “sunset ” provision that would have reduced the exemption from $3.5 million to $1 million and increased the tax rate from 45% to 55%, the Congress “kicked the can down the road” increasing the exemption to$5 million and the minimum tax rate to 35% , effective only until 2013.  Then, unless Congress does something, and based upon recent history, such may be doubtful, the exemptions will be reduced to$1 million and the minimum tax rate increased to 45%.

Now is the time to think about making plans to minimize the impact of future gift and estate taxes using the few vehicles available: present large gifts, a credit shelter trust or other approach that may be appropriate to specific individuals.  Only through the use of imaginative legal and accounting techniques can one hope to minimize the impact of anticipated tax changes.

[click to continue…]

Liability of volunteer coaches

by Philip on March 28, 2011

Many of us, down through the years have served as volunteer coaches for sports teams, often with only rudimentary knowledge of the sport – such as rugby, soccer or cheerleading – perhaps because we were signed up by a spouse or because we were asked by our children or another equally ignorant parent. Michigan’s Supreme Court has recently ruled that in the event of an injury to a child – participant – a coach may be held liable for damages to the child if, as a coach, he was simply “negligent.”  The negligent standard is whether he or she acted as a person with ordinary knowledge would have done under the circumstances. With that low a standard, the potential for substantial liability – for which insurance may not be available – should be of great concern for each of us ready volunteers. We suggest that a careful review of the potential for liability is called for before agreeing to accept responsibility for the safety of the children of others.

Today I received a message from an unnamed source claiming that an extensive – and expensive – correctional facility, with several photos, had been built in Chicago as the Cook County Correctional Center that looked more like a country club than a prison, with the following Question:
“Who was the US Senator who helped arrange the funds to build this beautiful “punishment center”???
Oh yes, it was Obama!!!
No wonder he sees nothing wrong with the wasted spending in his “Stimulus Plan”.
This is where he plans on putting the terrorists from Gitmo,
and we have Americans living in cardboard boxes on the streets that have never killed anyone. Nothing makes sense anymore.”

I was initially outraged by the information – but on further investigation it appears that the several photos, while authentic, do not depict the Cook County Correctional Center in Chicago, despite what is claimed in forwarded emails. The facility is the Justice and Detention Center in Leoben, Austria, designed by renowned architect Josef Hohensinn.
Reportedly, the Center was completed in 2005 and houses the District Court and public prosecutor’s office as well as a prison designed “to optimize the quality of residence for employees and inmates.” Prisoners are housed in groups of up to 15 (to a total capacity of 205) and can move freely between their compact but well-appointed cells and communal spaces, which include exercise rooms, sports facilities, and outdoor courtyards. Needless to say, the thinking behind the institution represents a bold, new — and not uncontroversial — concept in prison design.

No such facility exists in Chicago, Illinois, and the statements that it was built with funds appropriated by Senator Barack Obama was clearly false, and a blatant political smear.

While it is appropriate to engage in reasonable discourse about the pro and cons of President Obama, and I, for one, have may questions and concerns, to put out such smears not only is inexcusable, but it tends to place in question all legitimate factual criticism.  One should not have top undertake individual research on every thing that his “enemies” or legitimate “critics” may say about him, or any issue of concern to us as citizens.   It is not easy for each of us to separate the legitimate critics from “enemies” who generate and disseminate the big lies.

The story put me in mind of a quote attributed to Dr. Paul Joseph Goebbels, Reich Minister of Propaganda in Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1945, ” The bigger the lie, the more they believe it!”  While perhaps true, I hope the readers of our Blog are smarter than that and welcome any comments.

Wind Farms are in our Future

by Philip on February 24, 2011

With Lansing’s mandate that “renewable energy” be an ever important component of the electrical generation industry, several entities are in line to construct “Wind Farms” that will have an impact on large areas of currently non-residential lands for perhaps one hundred years or more. To call the projects “Wind Farms” may be a misnomer. Indeed, the proposed projects are more akin to large industrial facilities that overlay agricultural lands. Although currently there appear to be little State or local regulation of the growing industry, the probable impact on both property values and the future potential for residential development as well as the “quality of life” of those in the areas affected may spur efforts to apply some regulatory parameters that will protect those persons not necessarily agreeable with what may be happening in their backyard.

Federal Estate Tax

by Philip on January 4, 2011

The recent extension of the Federal Estate Tax that raises the exemption to $5 million until 2012, with a maximum rate of 45%, does little to aid in planning an estate. With the acrimony in Congress surrounding the extension, there is little doubt that such will be repeated in the final months of 2012, the outcome largely dependent upon the success of the current Congress to effectively address the economic picture facing the country and the world. Unless the extension continues, the exemption would be reduced to $1 million with a maximum rate of 55%.

Citizens whose estates may be impacted by the Estate Tax should not simply through up their hands. Rather, it may make sense to plan with alternative outcomes designed to go into effect, depending upon what the Congress may do. Such plans will require the cooperative effort of both attorneys and tax accountants and will, likely,  not be available “off the shelf.”  Each plan should be drafted and crafted to meet the the specific intentions of the client and the perceived needs of his or her family. Such plan should also reflect the current increase in the gift tax exemption, from $1 million to $5 million, exemptions that, like the estate tax, may only continue until 2012.